Even the most casual of stock
market observers must be aware of the pervasive influence
the Federal Reserve Bank can and does have on stock price
movement by virtue of its control of monetary policy.
Although one of the tools of the Federal Reserve system is
the ability to alter margin rates, the Fed has dropped this
as a policy tool and works almost exclusively through its
ability to influence interest rate movements.
As has also been widely reported,
the Fed's deliberations on what policy initiatives to adopt
are closely linked with the central bank's concerns about
the prospects for inflationary pressures to rebuild in the
economy. What is the relationship between interest rates and
inflation and why does something that seems to be largely a
capital market issue, matter to the stock market?
The answer lies firstly, in
properly understanding what an interest rates is. Most
people think of money as simply a medium of exchange that
came into existence in ancient times as a means of
facilitating trade. People used to barter merchandise to
obtain their needs. This system became increasingly unwieldy
and merchants and bankers banded together to create
transferable certificates that represented available
quantities of merchandise. This eventually turned into what
we today refer to as money or currency.
But money itself is also a
commodity. Although we generally think of money in terms of
what we can purchase with it, the fact is that if we do not
need it at present we can give it to someone else who may
need it. If it is a friend of relative, we may not give
compensation a second thought and expect to get back no more
than we lent. However, in a business environment we may feel
we are entitled to something of value in return.
If we were in the car rental
business, we would impose a daily fee for the use of the
car, plus extra charges for insurance, gasoline usage etc.
Someone who is in the money business, in effect rents out
money and expects some fee in return as well. This fee is
what is called the interest rate.
Specifically, when renting a car,
the agency charges a rate it believes covers all its costs
and in addition provides a profit component. The renter is
also required to buy insurance or have coverage from another
dealer, to protect against damage.
When borrowing money, the borrower
is also expected to pay a rate that will cover the lender
for any possible damages or "wear and tear," plus some
profit. In the vernacular, these components are referred to
as the inflation premium and credit risk. The greater the
threat of inflation and the more risk the lender accepts if
the borrower has some history of not repaying promptly or
fully, the higher the interest rate premium will have to be.
There is a rule of thumb in banking
circles (although not universally accepted) that the "real
cost of money" is about 3.0%, with anything above this rate
representing the inflation and risk premiums.
The inflation premium is necessary
to maintain the lenders purchasing power. If the rate of
inflation is running at five percent a year, what is really
happening is that the value of the money is depreciating at
a rate of five percent a year. What cost $1.00 the first
year, sells for $1.05 the following year.
When lending money, the lender in
effect says I need to receive five cents on every dollar
just to keep my purchasing power stable. Beyond this, he
will want to earn a bit of a profit, which the "rule of
thumb" estimates to be about 3.0%. Accordingly, if the
long-term rate of inflation is perceived to be about 5.0%,
then we would assume long-term rates to be in the vicinity
of 8.0%.
Inflation is not a phenomenon that
just bursts undetected on the scene one morning. It is
usually the result of economic conditions that have been
festering for a period of time, without being checked or
countered. The Federal Reserve Board, mindful of the
economic toll the prolonged period of double-digit inflation
had on the U.S. economy in the 1970’s, has determined that
preventing a repeat of this cycle is one of its primary
responsibilities.
There are several ways that
inflation comes into being. One is when a shortage exists in
a desired product. The available supply may be rationed
through price increases. Another method of inflation is
provided by rising costs of the components of a product.
When oil prices rise very rapidly, products or services that
are very dependent on energy will command higher prices to
compensate for this increased costs.
When fuel costs soar, airlines need
to charge more for tickets to counter their much higher fuel
bills. If labor is in short supply, workers may demand
higher salaries to keep producing goods or providing
services. These costs must be passed along to the consumer
if the provider is to maintain a reasonable profit margin on
his services. To the extent the consumer is forced to pay
more for a product or service without obtaining any
incremental benefits, the increase is inflationary.
If, however, the higher costs are
offset by some improvement in the product then the cost
increase may be warranted. If auto manufacturers raise
prices for their vehicles by several hundred dollars the
increase would be inflationary if there were no commensurate
benefit in the new vehicles. However, if the manufacturer
includes in the base price accessories that previously were
charged for separately, the higher cost may not be deemed
inflationary.
Historically, inflation was
described as being caused either by "wage push" or "demand
pull." With various international cartels in a position to
artificially influence the costs of some raw materials, such
as OPEC’s role in the oil market, there can be inflationary
pressures that are outside the traditional channels.
The net effect of inflation on the
consumer, is to rob him of purchasing power. There is always
some inflation going on in a growing economy. When the
increase is moderate, the consumer is usually able to offset
the effect through wage increases. This generally allows him
to keep pace and hopefully even keep a little bit ahead of
the trend.
At other times, wages alone do not
provide adequate relief and the consumer may have to find
ways around this that can enable him to maintain a certain
standard of living or consumption pattern. One method is
through a simple process of substitution. In one form or
another, everybody practices this on occasion. If one goes
into a store for a Hershey chocolate bar and they are sold
out, the Nestle bar may make an acceptable alternative.
Similarly if the price of coffee were to spike higher, some
consumers may elect to substitute another beverage such as
tea. To the extent substitution is an alternative, the
effect of inflation can be mitigated. If enough consumers
are able to switch products, such activities may even be
able to bring down the price of the particular product by
leaving the producer with unsold merchandise.
However, such efforts to repel
inflation or mute its impact, are not always successful or
even feasible. To the extent that they are regarded as
threatening to the economy, they may call for more drastic
action. This could take the form of an organized boycott of
a particular good or service if it was felt that this could
bring about a price rollback.
If the threat of inflation is more
widespread or runs the risk of causing more severe damage to
the economy, the Federal Reserve Bank may find itself
compelled to take action to thwart this prospect.
MONETARY POLICY
The Federal Reserve Bank is charged
with managing the nation's monetary policy. In broad terms,
this relates to controlling the amount of money in the
economy and thereby granting it considerable influence in
the setting of interest rates. In addition to the
aforementioned impact inflation can have on interest rates,
by raising the inflation premium; the Fed too can have an
impact by increasing or decreasing the availability of money
for lending purposes.
Working through the nation's
banking system, the Federal Reserve controls the amount of
reserves within the banking system, which in effect, affects
the ability of the banking system to lend money. If money is
readily available, it is seen as encouraging business to
spend more on new products, acquisitions, raw materials and
labor. This in turn is seen as encouraging some upward
movement in prices to pay for these expenditures. As
expectations increase throughout the economic system,
everybody wants to share in what is perceived as the new
found wealth. If at the same time the government seeks to
participate in all this by spending beyond its means, namely
raising the deficit, and the Fed acquiesces by monetizing
the debt. This monetization may initially lower rates by
making more money available. But before long the market will
realize the seeds of another inflationary spiral are being
sown and before long rates will be heading higher.
The Fed, therefore, has to walk a
very tight line between making credit too available, and
fostering inflation on the one hand, and being too stingy,
and causing an economic slowdown, on the other.
There are several tools available
to the Fed to manage the money supply and credit. The most
common, used almost every business day, is the intervention
by the Fed's operating arm, the Open Market Desk, in the
money market. The desk enters the market almost every day to
arrange Repo or Reverse Repo. In simple terms, this
operation involved either the purchase or sale of debt by
the Fed from or to its dealer network, on a temporary basis.
When it buys securities (arranges a
repo), the Fed in effect provides the banking system with
short-term money which increase its reserves, and allows its
to lend more money or conversely borrow less. When it
arranges reverse repo, or matched sale, is sells securities
to the dealers forcing them to get more money to pay the Fed
for securities, thereby draining reserves and firming
interest rates.
The Fed also controls the levels of
required reserves, pegs the discount window rate and
determines how much margin investors are allowed for
securities transactions. However, these are rarely altered
and most are utilized mainly when the Fed desires to bring
about a fundamental change in the economic outlook, not fine
tune a well performing engine.
When we read in the paper that the
Federal Reserve is expected to tighten monetary policy, or
raise rates, at it next FOMC meeting, what is meant is that
the central bankers have decided to provide less credit in
the form of reserves to the banking system. This in turn
drives up the price (interest rate) for Federal Funds, which
are essentially excess reserves that banks trade among
themselves.
Banks are required to maintain
reserves on all their deposits. Every Wednesday they are
required to balance their books and prove they have adequate
reserves. Usually the large money center banks operate very
efficiently and employ all their deposits to the fullest
extent permissible. Sometimes they run over and are short
reserves. At the same time smaller country banks almost
always have excess reserves because they operate less
efficiently or in markets that are less active. These banks
can lend their excess reserves to the money center banks
through the Federal Funds Market. The Fed's requirement is
that the banking system as a whole be in reserve balance.
When the Fed operates to make less
reserves available, it in effects constrains banks from
lending. This in turn leads to higher interest rates as a
means for rationing the available credit. The higher rates
should cancel some borrowing plans, in effect slowing the
economy enough to wring out some inflationary expectations.
While this may sound like a bit of a "Catch-22" situation,
it is rather a system of cause and effect with more
expensive money, namely higher interest rates, serving to
undercut growth efforts and visa versa.